We simulated the most common data loss scenario –files lost to a virus, registry corruption or accidental deletion –and ran it across multiple hard drives to compare success rates. Remo Photo Recovery recouped all lost raster files in every test. Beyond that, it recovered 68 percent of lost vector images and 63 percent of production images. In our reformatted clean master android drive tests, Remo recovered 100 percent of JPG files and 99 percent of other raster image files. Vector images saw a 73 percent return, and production images saw 63 percent recovery.
However, the software really struggled to recover any of the camera raw files during the reformatting portion of our tests. Overall, we found Remo’s photo recovery software to be extremely easy to install and use. Its modern, colorful interface is intuitive, and it only takes a few clicks to initiate a scan. While the software did an excellent job at recovering the files themselves, it failed at recouping their original names, so you’ll have to re-identify and relabel each one.
It can recover nearly all major camera raw formats, making the program suitable for serious photographers needing to recover lost raw images on their memory cards. Our tests simulated data loss from two of the most common data loss scenarios: lost files and a reformatted drive. We tested each scenario on an HDD, SSD and SD card. PhotoRescue recovered 75 percent of lost JPG files and 53 percent of other raster images, which are both below-average scores, although it recovered an above-average number of production files. In testing reformatted drives, it recovered 72 percent of JPGs.
However, it recovered just 29 percent of other raster images and 24 percent of camera raw images. The program succeeds at recognizing all major camera raw images aside from Samsung and Epson. PhotoRescue has one of the fastest scanning speeds of any product in our comparison, an average of 143GB per hour. Speed doesn’t mirror quality, but it does help you get your images back quicker in a stressful situation. The app’s recovery speed wasn’t as fast, however, coming in at just 47GB per hour. Though PhotoRescue wasn’t the most effective software overall, it works well for certain data loss situations, especially for its low price.
In our testing, we simulated the two most common data loss scenarios – a reformatted drive, and lost files through accidental deletion – which we performed on an SSD, HDD and SD card. It recouped 100 percent of JPG images. The software did well in recovering other file types in our lost scenarios but performed below-average in our reformatted drive tests. GetData was the only program that recognized every major camera raw format we threw at it.
Each raw format is unique to the brand recover usb drive of camera it stems from, and typically their uncompressed nature makes them difficult for recovery software to recognize. GetData’s ability to recognize and recover lost files across such a wide variety of formats means that it’s the best for digital camera users.
However, the software really struggled to recover any of the camera raw files during the reformatting portion of our tests. Overall, we found Remo’s photo recovery software to be extremely easy to install and use. Its modern, colorful interface is intuitive, and it only takes a few clicks to initiate a scan. While the software did an excellent job at recovering the files themselves, it failed at recouping their original names, so you’ll have to re-identify and relabel each one.
It can recover nearly all major camera raw formats, making the program suitable for serious photographers needing to recover lost raw images on their memory cards. Our tests simulated data loss from two of the most common data loss scenarios: lost files and a reformatted drive. We tested each scenario on an HDD, SSD and SD card. PhotoRescue recovered 75 percent of lost JPG files and 53 percent of other raster images, which are both below-average scores, although it recovered an above-average number of production files. In testing reformatted drives, it recovered 72 percent of JPGs.
However, it recovered just 29 percent of other raster images and 24 percent of camera raw images. The program succeeds at recognizing all major camera raw images aside from Samsung and Epson. PhotoRescue has one of the fastest scanning speeds of any product in our comparison, an average of 143GB per hour. Speed doesn’t mirror quality, but it does help you get your images back quicker in a stressful situation. The app’s recovery speed wasn’t as fast, however, coming in at just 47GB per hour. Though PhotoRescue wasn’t the most effective software overall, it works well for certain data loss situations, especially for its low price.
In our testing, we simulated the two most common data loss scenarios – a reformatted drive, and lost files through accidental deletion – which we performed on an SSD, HDD and SD card. It recouped 100 percent of JPG images. The software did well in recovering other file types in our lost scenarios but performed below-average in our reformatted drive tests. GetData was the only program that recognized every major camera raw format we threw at it.
Each raw format is unique to the brand recover usb drive of camera it stems from, and typically their uncompressed nature makes them difficult for recovery software to recognize. GetData’s ability to recognize and recover lost files across such a wide variety of formats means that it’s the best for digital camera users.
评论
发表评论